NodeSaver

§ 01 — ETF Investing

The silent cost of ETF fees.

A 0.6% difference in management expense ratio looks trivial each year. Over 20 years on a growing portfolio, it can cost you tens of thousands of dollars. Compare two funds side-by-side and see the long-run cost of MER drag.

Updated · Jun 2026·MER drag modelled annually·Read · 5 min

Your inputs

A$
A$
8%
%
%
20yr

MER applied as annual drag on gross return. Contributions at start of year.

The result

Fund A (0.07% MER)
$720,141

$4,150 in fees

Fund B (0.67% MER)
$661,964

$37,656 in fees

Fund A leads by
$58,177

extra fees paid by Fund B: $33,506

§ Balance by year

Returns compound annually. MER drag is applied as a reduction to gross return each year. Contributions are assumed at the start of each year. Not financial advice.

Advertisement

How ETF fee drag works

Every ETF and managed fund charges an annual management expense ratio (MER) — a fee expressed as a percentage of assets under management. The fee is deducted from the fund's net asset value continuously, reducing your effective return each year.

  1. 1. MER reduces your net return. If a fund earns 8% gross and charges a 0.67% MER, your net return is 7.33%. That 0.67% compounds against you every year — on a growing balance.
  2. 2. Compounding amplifies small differences. On Year 1 of a $50,000 portfolio, 0.67% = $335. By Year 20, when the portfolio has grown to $300,000+, the same MER costs over $2,000 in a single year. Fees compound because they are charged on an ever-larger balance.
  3. 3. Active funds vs. index ETFs. Broad-market Australian ETFs (VAS, IOZ, STW) charge 0.05%–0.20% MER. Actively managed funds typically charge 0.50%–1.50%. Decades of research suggest active funds rarely outperform their benchmark by enough to justify the higher MER.
  4. 4. Inside superannuation, fees matter even more. Super balances are larger and held for longer — a 0.5% fee difference inside super can cost $100,000+ over a 30-year career. ASIC's MoneySmart tools use similar projections to show fee drag in super.
  5. 5. How to minimise fee drag. Choose broad-market index ETFs with MERs below 0.20%. Avoid churning — brokerage and spreads add up. Consider a single diversified ETF (e.g. VDHG at 0.27%) over a multi-fund portfolio if it simplifies rebalancing.

§ Letters & replies

ETF fee questions, answered.

Common questions about management expense ratios, MER drag, and long-run ETF costs.

What is a management expense ratio (MER)?+ open

A management expense ratio (MER) is the annual fee charged by an ETF or managed fund, expressed as a percentage of assets under management. For example, a 0.07% MER on a $100,000 portfolio costs $70 per year. The fee is deducted daily from the fund's net asset value, so you never see a direct charge — but it reduces your return each year.

How much does ETF fee drag really cost over 20 years?+ open

The compounding effect is substantial. A 0.6% MER difference on a $50,000 portfolio with $10,000 annual contributions at 8% gross return leaves you roughly $60,000–$80,000 poorer after 20 years compared with the cheaper fund — despite the fee seeming small each year. The drag compounds because fees are charged on a growing balance.

What is a good MER for an Australian ETF?+ open

Most broad-market Australian ETFs charge 0.05%–0.20% MER. Common funds like VAS (Vanguard Australian Shares) charge 0.07%, while VGS (Vanguard International Shares) charges 0.18%. Actively managed funds typically charge 0.50%–1.50%, sometimes higher. For long-term index investing, keeping MER below 0.20% is a reasonable benchmark.

Is MER the only fee I should worry about?+ open

MER is the most significant ongoing fee, but there are others: brokerage to buy and sell, bid-ask spread, and potential buy/sell spreads built into the fund's unit pricing. For buy-and-hold investors using low-cost ETFs, MER dominates the fee picture. This calculator focuses on MER drag as it is the primary determinant of long-run cost difference between funds.

Does this calculator account for tax?+ open

No — this calculator shows pre-tax balances to isolate the pure impact of MER on your wealth. In practice, distributions from ETFs are taxable each year (at your marginal rate or 15% inside super). A low-MER ETF also tends to be more tax-efficient because it generates fewer taxable events than an actively managed fund.