Every ETF and managed fund charges an annual management expense ratio (MER) — a fee expressed as a percentage of assets under management. The fee is deducted from the fund's net asset value continuously, reducing your effective return each year.
- 1. MER reduces your net return. If a fund earns 8% gross and charges a 0.67% MER, your net return is 7.33%. That 0.67% compounds against you every year — on a growing balance.
- 2. Compounding amplifies small differences. On Year 1 of a $50,000 portfolio, 0.67% = $335. By Year 20, when the portfolio has grown to $300,000+, the same MER costs over $2,000 in a single year. Fees compound because they are charged on an ever-larger balance.
- 3. Active funds vs. index ETFs. Broad-market Australian ETFs (VAS, IOZ, STW) charge 0.05%–0.20% MER. Actively managed funds typically charge 0.50%–1.50%. Decades of research suggest active funds rarely outperform their benchmark by enough to justify the higher MER.
- 4. Inside superannuation, fees matter even more. Super balances are larger and held for longer — a 0.5% fee difference inside super can cost $100,000+ over a 30-year career. ASIC's MoneySmart tools use similar projections to show fee drag in super.
- 5. How to minimise fee drag. Choose broad-market index ETFs with MERs below 0.20%. Avoid churning — brokerage and spreads add up. Consider a single diversified ETF (e.g. VDHG at 0.27%) over a multi-fund portfolio if it simplifies rebalancing.